Stampede

[ME]

> > I enjoy it. It is entertainment for me.

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Rick Moen wrote:
> I don't.  I simply think it's disreputable to fire off a flamboyantly 
> wrong answer someone's honest, curious question about a distribution
> based on no more knowledge of the subject than a five-second glance at
> the first item on its FAQ.  And I didn't feel like letting the resulting
> misinformation pass without comment.

Perfect example of antagonism. :-) 

The answer is nt flamboyantly wrong. They make the claim, I restate their
claim. Resrarting a claim made by another, and stating it was their claim
is not wrong even if their claim was initially wrong.

It is basic critical thinking, and logic. A quote just exists, it is
neither right or wrong.

You can tell me my reference to their page all you want, but my reference
is not wrong.

--ME