[NBLUG/talk] What's the status of IPV6?

Michael Long mlong at mikesoffice.org
Wed May 6 11:47:04 PDT 2015


> On May 6, 2015, at 10:21 AM, gandalf at sonic.net wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure how it helps much with a typical home as it's going to have one real IP address even if it's dynamic. They could trace it back to a physical address easily and then how many machines were in use at that time. A large business is a bit more anonymous. Also I'm pretty sure that NATing will still work with IPV6 even though it's largely unnecessary. With IPV6 you really wouldn't even need a router as a switch would do the trick, but I think most folks would still use one due to the fire walling abilities.

This is a rehash of old arguments from 2000’s. NAT isn’t about privacy or security. It just happens to be one of the side effects. NAT is about not having to re-address your entire network when you move providers. 

You DON’t NAT ipv6. If you need security get a real firewall :) Most larger companies (and probably what verizon is doing) is ipv6 RD. It’s a stateless tunnel. Your end device is only v6 and if you try to access a v4 device the provider does the necessary v6 -> v4 translation. If you go to a site that support v6 no translation is necessary and it “just works”.

Mike

> 
> On 2015-05-06 10:15, Omar Eljumaily wrote:
>> This is my thinking about a big reason why IPV6 hasn't adopted
>> quickly.  There's a privacy issue.  I think that people like being
>> able to hide behind private network firewalls.
>> I'm not sure about routing efficiency of IPV4 NAT versus non-NAT IPV6.
>> It seems like they would be comparable.  I've heard that routing is a
>> big factor in internet speed & energy usage, but I could be wrong.
>> Omar
>> On 5/6/2015 9:55 AM, gandalf at sonic.net wrote:
>>> The government/school factor really likes real IP addresses that can be traced down to a physical machine and that's probably one of the largest reasons why we've run out of addresses.
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at nblug.org
>> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at nblug.org
> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk



More information about the talk mailing list