<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Lincoln Peters wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:e3d9cdf70801161311o47fd001alda16afe93cb7b91c@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 1/16/08, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mendozae@sonoma.edu">mendozae@sonoma.edu</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mendozae@sonoma.edu"><mendozae@sonoma.edu></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Don't Kubuntu and Ubuntu, for example, have adequate GUI's so as to not
need KDE 4? For example, is there a reasonable justification for
installing KDE 4 if though I'm running Kubuntu on my computer? Or am I
missing something here?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Unless someone comes up with a perfect GUI, there will always be
opportunity for something better. I haven't used any of the KDE 4
betas or release candidates, but the screenshots I've seen contain
lots of new and very interesting ideas that could make it a lot more
intuitive and user-friendly than KDE 3 and earlier.
Heck, some of the ideas I've seen could help to make KDE a nicer
experience than the Mac OS X GUI!
</pre>
</blockquote>
Whoot! Whoot!<br>
<br>
Would it be that we were just to out best OS X<br>
<br>
Hope this didn't sound rude on your end. It wasn't meant to be. :)<br>
</body>
</html>