[NBLUG/talk] Suse Versus Red Hat 9.0 and Jabber
Mark Street
jet at sonic.net
Wed Dec 3 16:21:03 PST 2003
I don't think it matters much on the distro. It has to do more with the
jabberd daemon.
I have run a 1.4 jabberd on my Red Hat boxen with light traffic for quite
sometime without a hit, its only XML. I noted this past week that jabberd2
is out.... better threading and load handling.
As a class extracredit project in my Intro Linux Sys Admin course I had them
install either jabberd 1.4 or 2 and see if they could get it working. They
are using RH 9 for the course and the damn thing wouldn't compile either one
without a fight.... come to find out RH did something funny with some of the
kerberos header files and libs. One enterprising student found the RPM of
1.4 and installed that...
I compiled jabberd2 on my fedora box without a hickup. go figure...
If you are interested in the references on how to compile it under RH 9 I can
send you the links. I have not installed the new SUSE... maybe on the break.
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 15:55, Murdock, Matt wrote:
> Has anyone had any experience with the Jabber IM on either of these
> platforms? What type of network overhead will this put on an existing
> infrastructure (of course it depends on the number of clients and such,
> but, is like, 20 users 5% more traffic overhead..??)?
--
Mark Street, D.C.
Red Hat Certified Engineer
Cert# 807302251406074
--
Key fingerprint = 3949 39E4 6317 7C3C 023E 2B1F 6FB3 06E7 D109 56C0
GPG key http://www.streetchiro.com/pubkey.asc
More information about the talk
mailing list