[NBLUG/talk] ipcop and alternatives

[Chris Wagner]

Awhile back I set up IPCop with four different interfaces (WAN, LAN,
DMZ, WLAN), most with the same brand of NIC.  It took a lot of juggling,
focus, and notes to keep it all straight, but once running it was great,
and has been solid for quite some time now.  IPCop is good, though a few
features need improvement and clarification.

- Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: talk-bounces at nblug.org [mailto:talk-bounces at nblug.org] On Behalf
Of Jose I. Sanchez
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 11:57 AM
To: General NBLUG chatter about anything Linux, answers to
questions,etc.
Subject: Re: [NBLUG/talk] ipcop and alternatives

My money is on IPCop.  Easy to deploy and good web interface.  Use two
different brand ethernet adapters.  Makes life easier when setting
things up.

Jose

----- Original Message -----
From: "Troy Arnold" <troy at zenux.net>
To: <talk at nblug.org>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 11:41 AM
Subject: [NBLUG/talk] ipcop and alternatives


> Hi-
>
> I'm looking to replace a crappy old linksys router (too old for
OpenWRT)
> with something that will do traffic shaping.  Since it will have to be
> maintained by non-geeks, I need something with a decent web interface.
>
> Ipcop looks like the front-runner right now.  I also looked at
m0n0wall 
> and
> smoothwall.  Any other options I should consider?
>
> thx
>
> -t
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at nblug.org
> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
> 



_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk at nblug.org
http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk