[NBLUG/talk] Need help with booting Linux system
Todd Cary
todd at aristesoftware.com
Thu Mar 17 12:57:20 PDT 2011
Scott -
Again thank you for the assistance, and my delays in getting back
is due to being "in the field" frequently.
I can afford to have the server down for a period of time since
it is mainly for FTP, testing PHP and displaying images for clients.
Do I include the EL in the symbolic link as in
vmlinuz -> vmlinuz-2.6.9-100.EL
Todd
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to
this file
# NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that
# all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
# root (hd0,0)
# kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
# initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/hdc
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title CentOS (2.6.9-100.EL)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-100.EL ro
root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet
initrd /initrd-2.6.9-100.EL.img
Todd
On 3/17/2011 12:01 AM, Scott Doty wrote:
> On 03/16/2011 04:58 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
>> Scott -
>>
>> Yup...I was not paying attention to the link syntax - I do
>> know better :-).
>>
>> On the advice of others in the Centos forum, I did the following:
>>
>> rpm -Uvh --replacepkgs --replacefiles
>> kernel-2.6.9-100.EL.i686.rpm
>> redhat-logos-1.1.26-1.centos4.4.noarch.rpm grub-0.95-3.8.i386.rpm
>>
>> So now I have the following in the /boot/ directory:
>>
>> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 9216 Mar 9 10:31 .
>> drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Jan 24 08:34 ..
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 51676 Feb 17 22:41
>> config-2.6.9-100.EL
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Mar 9 10:31 grub
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 444812 May 5 2007
>> grub-0.95-3.8.i386.rpm
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1343054 Mar 9 10:29
>> initrd-2.6.9-100.EL.img
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13409764 Feb 18 06:25
>> kernel-2.6.9-100.EL.i686.rpm
>> drwx------ 2 root root 12288 Jan 12 2007 lost+found
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9371 Aug 12 2006 message
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9371 Aug 12 2006 message.ja
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7919724 Aug 13 2006
>> redhat-logos-1.1.26-1.centos4.4.noarch.rpm
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 67797 Feb 17 22:41
>> symvers-2.6.9-100.EL.gz
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 770652 Feb 17 22:41
>> System.map-2.6.9-100.EL
>> drwx------ 2 root root 9216 Mar 9 10:03 .Trash-root
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1538264 Feb 17 22:41
>> vmlinuz-2.6.9-100.EL
>>
>> I am not sure of what to have the symbolic link for vmlinuz
>> point to; vmlinuz-2.6.9-100???
>>
>
> That looks correct. but check grub.conf to make sure the
> kernel file you're trying to boot is the correct one.
>
> Also, remember that it will look a little funny, if you have a
> separate /boot partition -- the filenames will be in the "root"
> directory, like this:
>
> title Fedora (2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64)
> root (hd0,0)
> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64 ro
> root=UUID=69effc7d-ef6e-4982-9bdc-2f3bea9e056e rhgb quiet
> SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 KEYTABLE=us selinux=0
> initrd /initramfs-2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64.img
>
> It's the kernel line I'm referring to, it will be
> "/vmlinuz-..." instead of "/boot/vmlinuz-..." -- but _only_ if
> /boot is a separate partition.
>
> Quick question -- if it _doesn't_ boot, can you afford for this
> system to be down until it can be fixed?
>
> -Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at nblug.org
> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
--
Ariste Software
Petaluma, CA 94952
http://www.aristesoftware.com
More information about the talk
mailing list