NBLUG Library ?

augie schwer at sonic.net
Thu Oct 24 21:49:12 PDT 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:51:01PM -0700, troy wrote:
> I've used peardb and adodb (thanks to postnuke).  Basic functionality is
> roughly the same but adodb adds some things that probably don't really
> belong in a DAL.  peardb, i think, is cleaner and certainly better and
> more consistently documented, especially if you're used to getting your
> info from the php manual.  peardb is much more similar to Perl::DBI, if
> you're used to that.  There are functions in adodb for formatting
> and displaying data as html which can be nice for those quick-n-dirty
> projects.  But really, familiarity can be gained with either in an hour.
> If i was to choose for a new project, i'd use pear db.  Actually, i
> really liked the old phplib stuff...

this sort of confirms my leaning towards pear, but could you elaborate
a little bit more on some of the things you think don't belong in
adodb?

 -augie


- -- 
irc.nblug.org #nblug
registered linux user #229905
gpg public key: http://www.sonic.net/schwer/schwer.asc
Key fingerprint = 9815 AE19 AFD1 1FE7 5DEE  2AC3 CB99 2784 27B0 C072

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9uM1Gy5knhCewwHIRAk5ZAJ922C/9F9lZVaJ+qD6W077iq1cdIQCdFm/h
/Es0yd3BQklcEZBu1Pso0QA=
=iLia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the talk mailing list