[NBLUG/talk] nasty messages from the kernel
micxz at slashdomain
micxz at slashdomain.com
Tue May 11 18:42:17 PDT 2004
To tell you the truth I do not understand the problem was in terms of
that post either. I thought you might be able to make sense of it. The
link was simply to tell you were I found this info.
--
Micxz
another goggled link:
http://www.debianhelp.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=phpBB_14&file=index&action=viewtopic&topic=5111&forum=5&start=0
E Frank Ball wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:53:38PM -0700, micxz at slashdomain wrote:
> }
> } Here's an excerpt from a posting to the NFS mailing list
> } from Neil Brown:
> } -------------Included message-----------------------
> } Previously anonymous dentries were hashed (though with no name, the
> } hash was pretty meaningless). This meant that they would hang around
> } after the last reference was dropped. This was actually fairly
> } pointless as they would never get referenced again, and caused a real
> } problem as umount wouldn't discard them and so you got the message
> } printk("VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. "
> } "Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice
> } day...\n");
> }
> } In 2.4.6-pre3 I stopped hashing those dentries so now when the last
> } reference is dropped, the dentry is freed. So now there will never be
> } more anonymous dentries than there are active nfsd threads.
> } ---------------end included message-------------------
> }
> } From:
> }
> } http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg53163.html
>
>
> I don't fully understand all that (and the link), but it implies that
> the problem was fixed in 2.4.6 and I'm using 2.4.20-28.9smp (RedHat).
> I guess I'm seeing something a little different than the examples they
> used.
>
--
Micxz
More information about the talk
mailing list