[NBLUG/talk] A Non-linux Hardware Question
Stephen Cilley
hydro_mancer at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 2 04:04:28 PST 2006
Thanks for the tip. About how large should the blocks
be, in your estimation?
Thanks,
Stephen
--- Chris Palmer <chris at eff.org> wrote:
> Stephen Cilley writes:
>
> > Actually, I wasn't talking about making a seperate
> partition, I was
> > always told that there were distinct advantages to
> having a seperate
> > physical drive for the OS. Also, in this case I
> won't have any *nix
> > systems on it at all. It's my gaming machine. So
> do you think there
> > is no advantage to having a seperate drive?
>
> It depends entirely on the demands your application
> puts on the storage
> system. There is no single, magic answer.
>
> In a game system, I imagine disk access is generally
> sequential and not
> often interrupted (you are single-tasking, and just
> reading large hunks
> of game data). Without thinking about it any
> further, I'd guess you want
> a disk with the greatest throughput and the lowest
> seek times you can
> get. (Even the highest throughput drive will not
> saturate your bus,
> though.) The WD Caviar you referred to earlier looks
> like a reasonable
> choice along these lines. Also it might help to set
> a large block size
> on your filesystem, since you will be concerned
> about performance in
> reading large data objects. (This will result in
> some wasted space for
> small files, but on a 320 GB disk, it probably won't
> affect you any time
> soon.)
>
>
> --
> https://www.eff.org/about/staff/#chris_palmer
>
> > _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at nblug.org
> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
More information about the talk
mailing list