[NBLUG/talk] Hello

Walter Hansen gandalf at sonic.net
Fri Nov 4 14:50:40 PST 2005


OMG I can actually say this phrase twice (recycled phrase to follow):

Wow! I've got a gig and I don't even have a band!

I haven't said that since 1990.

> Art Hampton wrote:
>
>> What was a reasonably brisk machine now is a slow slug. C'mon!! What
>> the F is going on here? All I do is a little typing, a spreadsheet now
>> and then and surf a bit. What is the advantage of the new and bloated
>> OS? When Unix was invented did they have machines with 256 megabytes
>> of ram? I don't think so...
>> ...
>> Art
>
>
> Hey, Art:
>
> Welcome.  I don't have a direct answer to your question, but I'm
> wondering if the group could comment on how OpenOffice is evolving.
> OpenOffice has often been labeled as slow and I wonder if a change in OO
> might be what you're describing, rather than bloat in the OS as a whole.
>
> I use 2 machines:  a Dell (Dimension 2300 with 512 ram) and a laptop
> (IBM g40 ThinkPad, 256 ram), both running Fedora Core 4.  The laptop is
> usually a bit faster than the desktop, but when it comes to starting
> OpenOffice, the laptop takes forever.  It wasn't always so bad, but
> either my switch to FC4 or one of the subsequent OpenOffice upgrades has
> really slowed it down, as far as OO is concerned.
>
> It takes about 3 minutes to open on my laptop, and about 20 seconds on
> my desktop.  I've tried tweaking some of the OO configurations, but it
> hasn't helped.  I know that at one point my laptop was running prelink,
> but I turned that off because it would slow everything down for a couple
> of minutes while it loaded.
>
> Anyone have any tips or info?  Or do we need a Gig of ram to run
> OpenOffice 2?
>
> -dave.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at nblug.org
> http://nblug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>





More information about the talk mailing list